Wednesday, 10 April 2013

Why did we invade Libya?

War is big business in 2009 the USA millitary budget was $663bn ( 4.3% of the gdp). Did you know that the UK makes all the land military vehicle except the Humvee? Did you know that Libya was a former UK colony? Did you know that Libya has the biggest oil fields in Africa and the fifth largest in the world? Maybe you did but did you know that Gaddafi wanted to be payed in gold for oil and that he was making plans to do so? In my opinion I believe that very big business men were protecting their investments, if you haven't herd of the illuminatti already then you must have been living under a rock. The fact is their are many groups claiming to be Illuminatti but you can't be sure of who is who. In my opinion I just believe these groups of people to be manipulated puppets, the string pullers in some these groups maybe part of something else more sinister if they have well funded programmes. One group that is authentic and real is the Bilderberg group, This is a group of around 120 of the wealthiest and most powerful people in the world, Henry kissinger  ,Prince Charles and Obama have attended their meetings. They have big meetings in 5 star resorts with big security campaigns. This is big business. Money is infinite in one sense if it's just numbers on a computer screen where as Gold is a finite resource. Trading finite resources for other finite resources is how we used to barter (say 10 chickens for one sheep). That is why gold was used as currency because it has real value, it can not be created by man, If Gaddafi had succeeded in getting payed in gold or if he had succeeded in withholding their oil until payment in gold then it would of snowballed dramatically and a possible spontaneous WW3 would be on our hands. My reason for thinking there would be a spontaneous global war is that many other countries with natural resources would follow suite however there are officials in all countries who are dedicated servants to the Bilderberg ( I will just say bilderberg to put a face on it, I don't know who these people are at the top but you will need to be very wealthy to gain an audience with them so I will just say Bilderberg )  and they can't have a loss of control without a fight. With the rise of the internet there is more freedom of knowledge and opinions so every time we want to invade a country we have to be seen fixing a problem or else there would be a rebellion organised over the internet. In Iraq we were portrayed as the good guys helping out by exterminating the evil rebels who fought for the destruction of freedom where as this time we were portrayed as the good guys who helped out the rebels of an oppressive government. This has been cheaper and more  strategically sound move because it showed the Arab league what they're capable of. Gaddafi was supported by many western officials during his time in power because not only has he sold them oil but he kept the radicals at bay by making Libya a rich country. He has essentially created a legacy for his country ( Libyans had the highest standard of living in Africa even ahead of Russia and Saudi Arabia). I suggest typing in on youtube "Libya truth" a video will come up on the first page highlighting all of his achievements. After the Libyans were slightly westernised they could of easily been manipulated in to fighting a war for a democracy. One bbc news report that aired at the time of the rebellion said they had reports of CIA agents having virtual seminars with Libyans before the conflict to antagonize and misinform them. I have been told by an oil rig worker that the rebellions were staged and that it was common knowledge in the industry. The first thing the rebels did after they overthrew gaddafi was to create a western style Central bank that earns interest up until then loans were 0% from the government. My final conclusion in my opinion is that Gadaffi was working with the bilderberg and later on in life stood up to them (for whatever reasons) then the bilderberg orchestrated an uprising to make example of him. I don't know enough about gaddafi from trusted sources so I won't pass judgement on him all I will say is he could of easily been worse.

No comments:

Post a Comment

100% FREE

FREE Automated Traffic bots